On 2015-02-15, at 12:35, Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> wrote: > Marcin Borkowski <mb...@wmi.amu.edu.pl> writes: > >> Hi there, >> >> I don't want to be nitpicking, but I'm just curious. I'm looking at the >> function `org-split-string'. It uses (two times) the following >> construction: >> >> (setq list (cons (something) list)) >> >> Is there any particular reason for not using `push' there? > > These days you even have split-string in subr which you can make behave > like org-split-string.
Interesting. I'll look into it. > Oh, and there's all the cl re-implementations... I like org-some better > than cl-some just cause it sounds nice when you say it (try): Yes, it seems to me that reinventing the wheel is quite common in Emacs libraries. > org (tiny pause) some. At least one lame pun comes to mind... > —Rasmus Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Adam Mickiewicz University
