Vikas Rawal <vikasli...@agrarianresearch.org> writes: > Org-ref is very functional and has so far been able to deal with much > of my needs. So, I just hope we are not trying to fix something that > is not broken.
IMO for the same reason it is attractive to limit *bold* to imply bold. [At one point it was possible to alter the (export) interpretation of emphases]. Home-brewed solution are not stable compared to syntax. Getting ad-hoc citations in Org is very and there might be as many implementations as there are users. E.g. org-ruby would not (I hope) support [MY-CITE:MY-DOI]... > The real need in the context of citations is to somehow extend the > bibtex/biblatex integration to other export formats (odt/html, most > importantly). Will all the new stuff that is being proposed take us in > that direction? That is /a/ problem but not /the/ problem. E.g. some people prefer Zotero. Some might prefer DOI. If you can live with \cite-only there's already ox-bibtex.el that will support bibtex citations in html. —Rasmus -- May contains speling mistake
