Hi, Christian Moe <m...@christianmoe.com> writes:
> I haven't yet announced it on the list, for three reasons. 1) Not very > polished. There's some messy code, a poor man's user interface, and no > editing support for multiple citations (but support for exporting > them!). 2) It's part of a more ambitious project I set myself for an > all-round citation system that I never got on with. 3) It uses this cool > idea I had for how to use citation links differently, but it imposes > certain syntax conventions on the user, and they may yet change in > backward-incompatible ways if I develop this further. I also have a very half-baked branch somewhere with preliminary code, but mainly in terms of syntax/org-element (similar to pandoc). IMO we /need/ to add proper citation support to Org, preferably with a real syntax rather than these link-"solutions" and with good backend support (bibtex & Zotero for starters, I guess). #+begin_rant The current state is a mess and not portable. E.g. there's at least two Zotero projects, there's John Kitchin's code, there's ox-bibtex.el (which IMO is not suitable for complicated citation requirements), plus everyone and their mother's have got custom citation links in their config via custom org link types... /Proper/ citation support (not links) is, IMO, the last thing that is missing for good academic publishing support. #+end_rant —Rasmus -- I hear there's rumors on the, uh, Internets. . .
