Hi
Sebastien Vauban <sva-n...@mygooglest.com> writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> mcg <giepe...@googlemail.com> writes:
>>
>>> I use inline code for simple calculations to insert numeric results into
>>> text apart from "normal" code blocks for more complex calculations and
>>> graphics (all in R).
>>>
>>>
>>> The :results replace option is not working for inline code, even if I
>>> explicitly set it in the code block. So I get
>>>
>>> #+PROPERTY: session *R*
>>>
>>> #+begin_src R :results replace value
>>> 2+3
>>> #+end_src
>>>
>>> #+RESULTS:
>>> : 5
>>>
>>> src_R[:results replace value]{2+3} =5= =5= =5= =5= =5= =5=
>>>
>>> I would really like to have numeric outcome in the buffer (not only
>>> minibuffer upon evaluation) but also evaluate the whole buffer when
>>> exporting to have everything updated.
>>>
>>> What is the problem here? For now I would have to
>>> - evaluate only on export and keep :results silent
>>> - evaluate all manually - meaning I get repeated results if I call
>>> org-evaluate buffer
>>
>> :results replace is not implemented (yet?) for inline source blocks.
>
> For me, that's the correct behavior, as inline code blocks are *only
> expected to be evaluated during export*.
>
I disagree here. As limiting the use of inline code to
eval-on-export-only renders all the org-babel-execute-subtree and
related functionality useless.
Regards,
Andreas
