Thanks, that's a very simple way to search backlinks! I didn't know about org-search-view.
El Sun, 12 Oct 2014 22:17:27 -0700 Samuel Wales va escriure: > > (defun alpha-org-what-links-here () > "Show all links that point to the current node. Also show the > node itself. > > This makes id links quasi-bidirectional." > (interactive) > (let ((org-agenda-files (alpha-org-all-org-files > :archive t > :text-search-extra t)) > ;; turn off redundancy > ;; fixme probably going to be redone > org-agenda-text-search-extra-files) > (org-search-view nil (org-entry-get nil "ID" t)))) > > > On 10/12/14, Daniel Clemente <n142...@gmail.com> wrote: > > El Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:42:28 +0800 Eric Abrahamsen va escriure: > >> > > >> > This is the bit I'm not sure about... > >> > > >> > * project_a > >> > ** experiment about blah :proj_name:theme: > >> > [2014-10-11] > >> > > >> > Did x, y, and z today. Will analyze results tomorrow. > >> > > >> > [2014-10-12] > >> > > >> > Wow. Interesting finding. This will help a lot and may be relevant to > >> > future projects! > >> > > >> … > >> > >> Perhaps both links and tags are what you're after then: you could leave > >> a link to the general finding inside "experiment about blah" (to remind > >> yourself you took that note), but also use the tags to open Agendas on > >> both project and theme, so you can see all the relevant information in > >> one place. > >> > > > > > >> > * project_a > >> > ** experiment about blah :proj_name:theme: > > > > I think it's crazy to use topics as tags. How many topics/themes are > > there? Wikipedia counts many million. Names of topic are very subjective. > > Topics are often mixed, split apart, refined, renamed, grouped in > > supertopics, … > > In org it's easy to remodel hierarchical headers but it's not easy to > > remodel tags (much less, hierarchical tags). > > > > So rather than: > > > > ** some construction :plastics_engineering: > > > > > > I would have: > > > > Engineering.org: > > * Plastics > > * Houses > > * … > > > > > > I understand you use tags and „tag search“ to be able to look for bits of > > a particular topic in a file which is not related to the topic. > > It would be better to have a tag that in addition links to a particular > > tree. With that you'd have the freedom of tagging anything and the > > flexibility of headers. > > > > Some brainstorming about how to link tags with headers: Two options: > > > > 1) There is a main tag in a header, and the other tags link to it (with C-c > > C-o you navigate to the main tag). > > > > proj1.org: > > ** some construction :plastics_engineering: > > > > Engineering.org: :<<<plastics_engineering>>>: > > * Plastics > > * Houses > > * … > > > > > > 2) You use links and you ask for backlinks > > > > proj1.org: > > ** some construction [link to P] > > > > Engineering.org: > > * Plastics > > :ID: 1231212311122 > > * Houses > > * … > > > > And then… a key to *search for links to a header* („backlinks“). Can org do > > this now?. > > E.g. you go to „Plastics“ and you search „all the backlinks found in > > proj1.org“. Then you have the generic knowledge and in addition all the bits > > of specific knowledge about that topic. > > > > > > Maybe this is already possible… Whether it's useful, I don't know. > > > > > > > -- > The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com > > The disease DOES progress. MANY people have died from it. And > ANYBODY can get it. > > Denmark: free Karina Hansen NOW.
