Aaron Ecay <aarone...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi Eric, > > 2014ko urriak 12an, Eric Abrahamsen-ek idatzi zuen: >>> >>> Can the above inlinetask thing also be moved into the hook? That >>> seems cleaner, and gives another demonstration of the usefulness of >>> the feature. >> >> Here's a patch that does it, though I'm a little more cautious about >> this since I only did a minimal test. >> >> Two things that worry me: 1) why is it called "remove-END-maybe" when it >> appears to remove the whole inlinetask, and 2) it its original habitat >> in org-attach, it came after the call to org-cut-subtree, meaning that >> it couldn't have operated on the subtree to be archived at all! Or am I >> misunderstanding something? > > No, you’re not misunderstanding – I was. Indeed, the inline task stuff > has to come after the call to org-cut-subtree, so it’s not a candidate > for inclusion in the new hook. > > (What happens is that org-cut-subtree removes the inline task headline and > any contents, leaving a bare *** END line. The latter is subsequently > cleaned up by the org-inlinetask-remove-END-maybe call.)
Yup, I figured it out after another few minutes of staring at it. No harm done, I guess!
