Nick Dokos <ndo...@gmail.com> writes:
> Nick Dokos <ndo...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Sebastien Vauban <sva-n...@mygooglest.com>
>> writes:
>>
>>> Nick Dokos wrote:
>>>> Thorsten Jolitz <tjol...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>> Thorsten Jolitz <tjol...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>> As a side-remark, I did send these blocks with emptly lines
>>>>> between them,
>>>>> and when I look at my post in gmane the format looks alright, however
>>>>> when I open it in gnus the empty lines are gone and it looks like
>>>>> this:
>>>>>
>>>>>> * ORG SCRATCH
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #+BEGIN_QUOTE
>>>>>> hallo world
>>>>>> #+END_QUOTE
>>>>>> #+BEGIN_COMMENT
>>>>>> hallo world
>>>>>> #+END_COMMENT
>>>>>> #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
>>>>>> hallo world
>>>>>> #+END_EXAMPLE
>>>>>> #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
>>>>>> hallo world
>>>>>> #+END_SRC
>>>>>
>>>>> Am I the only one seeing this? Bug in gnus/message mode?
>>>>
>>>> I see empty lines between the blocks in gnus.
>>>
>>> I don't see the empty lines, like Thorsten.
>>>
>>
>> ... and on a different machine, I don't see them either.
>> Now I have to figure out what's different between them.
>>
>
> One machine is running Gnus v. 5.13: that one smooshes the code
> blocks together.
>
> The other is running Ma Gnus v. 0.12: that one leaves empty
> lines between blocks.
Maybe they switched to the new parser between versions, that parses a
src-block with :post-blank's, but does not take them into account when
interpreting?
,----[ C-h f mm-display-inline-fontify RET ]
| mm-display-inline-fontify is a compiled Lisp function in `mm-view.el'.
|
| (mm-display-inline-fontify HANDLE &optional MODE)
|
| Insert HANDLE inline fontifying with MODE.
| If MODE is not set, try to find mode automatically.
`----
is responsable here, and if we would find the place where 'handle' is
parsed (I couldn't in reasonable time) we would probably know what is
the problem ('handle' is the src-block in this case, 'mode' is 'org').
--
cheers,
Thorsten
