Hi Grant, I cannot reproduce. Here is what I see:
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp (setq org-babel-min-lines-for-block-output 10) (print 1) #+END_SRC #+RESULTS: : 1 #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp (setq org-babel-min-lines-for-block-output 0) (print 1) #+END_SRC #+RESULTS: #+begin_example 1 #+end_example Perhaps try with emacs -q and see what you get. Best, Ista On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Grant Rettke <g...@wisdomandwonder.com> wrote: > That is what I was thinking. > > I had set it to 0. > > What happened is that instead of a block showing up, the results were > delimited with a prepended '=' instead of a ':'. > > Unfortunately I forgot how this occurred, as I manually wrapped the > result with a block instead, so org was happy to use that instead. > Grant Rettke | ACM, ASA, FSF, IEEE, SIAM > g...@wisdomandwonder.com | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/ > “Wisdom begins in wonder.” --Socrates > ((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x))) > “Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop > taking it seriously.” --Thompson > > > On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Ista Zahn <istaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm somewhat confused by the "wrapped in =" part, but I think you are >> looking for 'C-h v org-babel-min-lines-for-block-output'. >> >> Best, >> Ista >> >> On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Grant Rettke <g...@wisdomandwonder.com> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Sometimes block evaluation results are wrapped with a single character like >>> =. >>> >>> When exporting to latex, the results block is lost. >>> >>> How may one force block evaluation always to be wrapped properly for >>> export to latex? >>> >>> org 8.2.7a >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Grant Rettke | ACM, ASA, FSF, IEEE, SIAM >>> g...@wisdomandwonder.com | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/ >>> “Wisdom begins in wonder.” --Socrates >>> ((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x))) >>> “Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop >>> taking it seriously.” --Thompson >>>
