> But in that case let me return to and refine my proposal: Why not have > "drawer" as the default unless "raw" is given?
Probably because "raw" never breaks your document, and is less verbose in the simplest cases (e.g., a single list, value, table...), which may be common enough. Anyway, it should be simple enough to switch to "drawer" as a default in your setup. > One could argue, that the extent of the results is implicitly given > when the results are not "raw", but being explicit here would allow for > some additional features (such as different background for results -- is > anyone doing this? I'd be interested). "raw" doesn't prevent to add a different background, if needed. > This is the state in org This is what I'd prefer... > --8<------start-------->8--- --8<------start-------->8--- > > #+PROPERTY: results drawer #+PROPERTY: results drawer > > > * Test * Test > > #+name: dtrn #+name: dtrn > #+begin_src R :exports both #+begin_src R :exports both > > "hello" "hello" > #+end_src #+end_src > > > #+results: dtrn > :RESULTS: #+begin_results dtrn > > hello hello > :END: #+end_results > --8<-------end--------->8--- --8<-------end--------->8--- What you prefer is a special block, which is not neutral during export process. Of course, a "result" block type could be added to Org syntax, but that would be redundant with drawers. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
