John Kitchin <jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu> writes: > I usually do this kind of tracking with a link to the email instead. It > is not automated communication between email and org, and it is not that > complicated, but it does what I need, when I need it.
I will stop with shameless plugs at some point here, but this is exactly what Gnorb does -- uses org to keep track of email conversations. Tracking is done with vanilla org links and state-change log notes, but the various gnorb functions make the whole process pretty much automated. https://github.com/girzel/gnorb#using-gnorb-for-tracking-email-todos > Esben Stien <b...@esben-stien.name> writes: > >> Esben Stien <b...@esben-stien.name> writes: >> >>> Do you have any means to bring replies and such back into the org file? >> >> This seems like it could be a really good thing. >> >> To be able to move the discussion to the relevant org file and then >> structure it and prioritize/schedule from there. >> >> It seems a lot better than to have all these different discussions >> inside gnus, so I'd really like to try this.
