Dnia 2014-03-27, o godz. 15:43:45 Rainer M Krug <rai...@krugs.de> napisaĆ(a):
> Brett Viren <b...@bnl.gov> writes: > > > Rainer M Krug <rai...@krugs.de> writes: > > > >> Brett Viren <b...@bnl.gov> writes: > >>> file:///path/to/foo.tex.orglink?line=42 > > > >> But jumping to the .org file would be the aim - right? > > > > Yes, right. Maybe a better example is: > > > > file://foo.orglink?line=42 > > calling > > ,---- > | emacs +42 foo.org > `---- > > should open the file foo.org and put the cursor in line 42. > > > > > which might get interpreted as "go to line 42 in ./foo.org". > > > > This example is also a relative link which would be less brittle as > > long as foo.org and foo.pdf are kept together in the same directory. > > Yes - that would be quite useful. > > > > >>> Chance of success: 10% > >> > >> I guess higher? > > > > I like your optimism! > > I am an optimist :-) You really are. Inserting stuff like this into the TeX file /may/ very easily break it, in the sense that it does compile, but /looks/ different (read: has different line and/or page breaks) than without it. (Though it /might/ be possible, I'm only saying that it would require much TeX expertise and being very careful. In fact, TeX4ht seems to do something similar (though I never used it), so maybe I'm too pessimistic;).) > Cheers, > > Rainer Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Adam Mickiewicz University