Hello, Bastien <b...@altern.org> writes:
> you just updated `org-open-at-point' without reimplementing the > previous behavior -- is this work in progress? No, it isn't. I fixed the bugs we discussed, and one reported on the ML. > If it is not, I suggest to discuss the change before implementing it. > Nobody ever complained about the previous behavior, and both Michael > and me are suppporting it. I didn't remove that non-essential feature for my pleasure, but because it didn't fit in the new internal model. As I already said, implementing it back is a bit of work and will probably not be very clean. Why bother? Anyway, I don't understand why there is so much fuss about this. As you well know, Org provides `org-next-link' (which is bound to C-c C-x C-n), and Emacs provides incremental search. Do you, or Michael, honestly open so many links that an additional C-s ... RET to move on each of them is too much? There is also `org-open-at-point-functions', which can probably be used here. I think that the coolness of the feature eludes me for all I can see is a crude hack. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
