Bastien <b...@gnu.org> writes: > Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > >>> So in short: If page breaks are not in org directly many people will >>> end up with inferior and/or less portable org files. >> >> For the record, after thinking about it, I'd rather stay away from >> invisible characters in Org syntax, would it be page breaks or >> non-breaking spaces. > > FWIW I fully support not using invisible chars in Org syntax.
This follows up on just a side aspect in this thread that is (partly) separate from its subject. Just to wrap the thread up in my words: 1. Cross-backend (or more cross-backend) support of \newpage built into Org directly was disapproved in favor of a less portable filter based solution [fn:1]. 2. Introducing invisible chars (as syntax for a possible implementation of such cross backend \newpage) in Org syntax was generally disapproved. Regards, Andreas Footnotes: [fn:1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/79164
