Hello, Rüdiger Sonderfeld <ruedi...@c-plusplus.de> writes:
> On Friday 22 November 2013 11:24:17 Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> Anyway, I don't think this is a good idea to introduce a new syntax just >> to avoid a one-liner (or a hook, see below). Also, this would only make >> sense in few export back-ends. > > But is it really a new syntax or just support for an existing Emacs > convention? See (info "(emacs) Pages"). > > It seems like a feature which could be supported in many back-ends: LaTeX, > ODT, HTML, Texinfo, Ascii, Org, (Groff), maybe even md with pandoc. I do not question this. My point is that introducing this new syntax would bring up nothing that can already be achieved using filters or hooks. So, is this feature a must-have? Or would a filter template in Worg more appropriate in this case? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
