Hello, Christian Moe <m...@christianmoe.com> writes:
> But on reflection, I think there's a strong case to change the default > ODT output of links with dedicated targets to page number > references. Under the new exporter, such <<targets>> are hidden in > output, i.e. they no longer contain text that will serve as a > description, and as shown by my example they may not always belong to a > heading. But in an ODT document they will always belong to a page, and > page number references would be a customary choice for printed media. > > If that sounds reasonable I'll send a mini-patch later today. You seem to forget a use-case here: when the target belongs to an item, [[target1]] returns its number. Displaying the page, albeit correct, would be less interesting in that situation. Also, that would introduce an incompatibility with every other major back-end. At the moment, the compatible way to handle it would just be to ignore [[target1]] altogether (and keep section/list/whatever number for other calls). What do you think? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
