On 14.11.2013, at 23:53, Bastien <b...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> Confirmed -- I quickly looked, it seems that `org-in-item-p' should do
>>> a better job when preceeded by invisible text.
>>
>> I need to rewrite this function.
>>
>> Anyway, I'm not sure what you mean in your last sentence because, as
>> a low-level function, its results shouldn't be affected by folding
>> status of the document (I didn't follow the thread closely, though, and
>> could be off tracks).
>
> The problem is this one:
>
> * Folded subtree...
>
> ^-{ Point here
>
> then M-x org-insert-heading RET will *not* insert a heading if the
> folded subtree is ending with a list, because `org-in-item-p' will
> infer point is within a list.
I think it is dangerous to change the behavior in such a way that
it will depend on the heading being folded or not. Definitely org-in-item-p
should not depend on that. I am still debating with myself if
org-insert-heading
should. Maybe only in interactive use or something like that. Dangerous
territory.
- Carsten
>
> So maybe `org-insert-heading' should be fixed instead, as a higher
> level function, ignoring the folded content before the point?
>
> --
> Bastien
>
