Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > I agree customization is more powerful here (although it means that all > non-English Org users will need to change it), but so it is for every > other multilingual string. > > Since we didn't choose to make multilingual strings customizable, I find > it strange that this particular one is. > > Also, I you can use a filter to modify that string and make it comply to > a specific style, if needed. IOW, you also get 1) and 2) with the > `org-export-dictionary' way, with 1) being more user-friendly and 2) > more difficult than in the current way. > > Am I missing something?
An example filter? Otherwise, I agree, there is no need to break the mold here. All the best, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com
