Hello, Jambunathan K <kjambunat...@gmail.com> writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Hello, >> >> feng shu <tuma...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> From 63eba2e491a0c410b3841cbad2dd1a9f80416bca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Feng Shu <tuma...@gmail.com> >>> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:52:10 +0800 >>> Subject: [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=. >>> >>> * ox-latex.el (org-latex-pdf-process): let =`make'= be a >>> preconfigured choice and change the wording of the docstring. >> >> I don't mind applying it, but shouldn't it as simple to provide >> a function that will call "make" instead? >> >> It's impossible to provide every solution in the wild for that. Is this >> one really necessary: it doesn't have complicated arguments. > > Can (other ...) be used here? See (info "(elisp) Composite Types") AFAIU, `other' means "whatever your answer is, always do the same", which is not what we want. If you want "give whatever you want and we'll use it", it should be a `string' type. But can't `function', which is already implemented, do the same anyway? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
