> I am sorry, I wanted to say that I want to do something like > (note: not current behavior) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > #+NAME: i_am_curious_how_this_works > #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp > (format "%s" org-babel-current-src-block-location) > #+END_SRC > > #+CALL: i_am_curious_how_this_works() > > #+RESULTS: i_am_curious_how_this_works() > : #<marker at 124 in tmp.org> > #+CALL: i_am_curious_how_this_works() > > #+RESULTS: i_am_curious_how_this_works() > : #<marker at 236 in tmp.org> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > and would like the yet to be defined solution in discussion here to > make also this possible,
If we do add #+names to call lines, and have them adopt the existing code block result behavior, then the above will work without modification. [...] >> Currently if you want have separate results for call lines with the same >> variables you will need to use a dummy variable. > > Ok, this answers one of my questions in the other thread and confirms > my expectation. Does it mean that my patch with the ERT as of > 2013-06-19 from the other thread is ok for now and can be applied just > to reflect what is currently supported? Or should I change something > else in the patch? > Yes, I've just applied this patch. Sorry for the delay. Thanks, -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte
