"Sebastien Vauban" <sva-n...@mygooglest.com> writes: Hello,
its a nice idea to be able to replace the source-blocks by their results when composing messages (if I understood your feature request right). Opens a lot of possiblilities for (semi-)automatic email creation. Here is the doc-string: #+begin_src emacs-lisp (defun outorg-replace-source-blocks-with-results (&optional arg &rest languages) "Replace source-blocks with their results. Only source-blocks with ':export results' in their header arguments will be mapped. If LANGUAGES is non-nil, only those source-blocks with a language found in the list are mapped. If LANGUAGES is nil but a prefix-argument ARG is given, only the languages read from the mini-buffer (separated by blanks) are mapped. Otherwise, all languages found in `org-babel-load-languages' are mapped." ...) #+end_src it basically says: - only blocks with ':export results' will be mapped - blocks for all languages found in `org-babel-load-languages' will be mapped, except the function ist called (from a program) with a list of language names (as strings) or the user calls the command with prefix arg (e.g. C-u) and enters language names (like this: R emacs-lisp sh org). let me know if the function does what you wanted. Do we need a keybinding for that, or should it rather be a bit oscure (only accessible by M-x) to avoid confusing accidents? > Thorsten Jolitz wrote: >> 2.3 Usage >> ~~~~~~~~~ >> >> There are only two commands involved: >> >> Command Keybinding Comment >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> M-x outorg-edit-as-org M-# M-# or M-# # outline-prefix M-# >> C-c ' outline-prefix C-c >> M-x outorg-copy-edits-and-exit M-# --- > > When I have "message" code blocks, and when I edit them in an indirect buffer > (for refilling them, for example), then I have a draft message that stays in > my Gnus/Message emails. > > Any idea how to get rid of that? > > Best regards, > Seb -- cheers, Thorsten
