On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Matt Lundin <m...@imapmail.org> wrote: > John Hendy <jw.he...@gmail.com> writes: > >>> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Christian Moe <m...@christianmoe.com> >>> wrote: > >>> I've been following this thread and there has been some great >>> discussion about future plans for re-write and context-sensitive >>> functionality. In the mean time, can we revert the C-RET behavior back >>> to adding a new headline? I'm finding it incredibly frustration to >>> have no way to just add a new headline below the current contents of a >>> headline, even if it's folded. I'm adding some individuals to my >>> contact file and have no way to just M-RET or C-RET to add a new >>> headline quickly except to navigate and manually type a series of *'s. >>> >>> If we could return one of these to the "old" functionality, that would >>> be great. (Or a recommended new way to just add a headline vs. >>> transforming the last line into a header.) >> >> Sorry for the noise. I think I just pulled on Friday, but a pull just >> now and re-make seems to have returned C-RET to doing what I thought >> it should. I may have pulled and never restarted my emacs session, so >> it's quite possible this was fixed earlier. > > That's curious. It has not been fixed here with the latest git.
Very curious! Your thread is exactly what I was experiencing before my pull/make clean/make this morning. Now I'm on: Org-mode version 8.0.3 (release_8.0.3-139-g419b69 @ /home/jwhendy/.elisp/org.git/lisp/) It's working and I verified it several times to make sure. Indeed, as with you, the most frustrating was it turning the last line of a folded headline into a new headline while staying sort of folded (or, for me, even bumping the ellipsis down below the current headline so one couldn't unfold it anymore). I guess I'm not sure what to say. I am experiencing what I would expect since my last pull, so I don't really feel compelled to re-pull to see if it's re-broken! Best regards, John > > I reported this in another thread: > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/72399 > > Sorry to have missed this thread. > > Matt