Joseph Vidal-Rosset <joseph.vidal.ros...@gmail.com> writes: > I thank you Eric and Uwe for your help. Many thanks also to all the > developers of emacs and org-mode. > > In fact I just spent two days in configuring my emacs24 and gnus. (Eric, I > did not understand how worked your emacs24-starter-kit , which is a nice > tool indeed). > > The last problem that I meet on my laptop is an error message : > smtp-server not defined , and , until now, I do not find how to fix it :( > (if someone has a suggestion, thanks in advance). >
Maybe you need to define the `smtpmail-smtp-server' variable? The following provides fairly simple step-by-step instructions for configuring gnus to work with gmail. http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/GnusGmail Gnus provides so many options that it can be daunting to configure. However a simple configuration (just reading and writing email) should be simple to configure (and should end up with a short <20 line configuration). The trick is to avoid including the sophisticated fancy extra options until *after* you have the basics working. Hope this helps, > > My goal is to succeed to stay in emacs, for LaTeX as well as for emails, > but I have to work again. Every help on LaTeX and emails via org-mode will > be welcome. > > > Best, > > Jo. > > > > 2013/5/15 Eric Schulte <schulte.e...@gmail.com> > >> Uwe Brauer <o...@mat.ucm.es> writes: >> >> >>> "Eric" == Eric Schulte <schulte.e...@gmail.com> writes: >> > >> > > Joseph Vidal-Rosset <joseph.vidal.ros...@gmail.com> writes: >> > >> >> > >> - >> > >> > > A while back Org-mode switched its method of exporting latex >> equations >> > > to HTML. Equations used to be exported as png images, however they >> are >> > > now exported as markup which may then be processed on the fly by >> > > client-side javascript. Most mail readers do not allow javascript >> in >> > > html email, and I doubt that the required javascript headers are >> > > included in the mail html mime part. >> > >> > > I don't know if it is currently possible to do the javascript >> > > pre-processing as part of the HTML export, but that would probably >> be >> > > the best solution in this case. >> > >> > Couldn't the old functionality (converting to png) be reactivated, at >> > least optionally?? For me this change are bad news, since the feature >> > (to export LaTeX math to something visible) is very important to me and >> > even if this approach may have disadvantages, it seems to me more >> > universal than the javascript business. >> > >> >> Indeed the old latex->png functionality is still available, I just had >> to update org-mime to work with the new exporter. Export of latex to >> attached png images should once again be working in the master branch of >> the git repo. >> >> Best, >> >> > >> > >> > Uwe Brauer >> > >> > >> >> -- >> Eric Schulte >> http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte >> >> -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte
