Hi Bastien, On 5/7/13, Bastien <b...@gnu.org> wrote: > IMHO this would be too much, since the let-binding solution is there > already.
I won't object to whatever decision is made, but it made me curious: is it not there for inheritance? This raises another question. Is it possible to do a let for each of the built-in views? Also, is it possible to do a let for the view that you get when you RET on a timestamp? Samuel -- The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com The disease DOES progress. MANY people have died from it. ANYBODY can get it.
