Hi Eric, Eric Schulte wrote: > Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: >> Eric Schulte <schulte.e...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> I'm loath to add /another/ results keyword, but perhaps it would be nice >>> to be able to specify that you want the results processed (e.g, >>> stripping the newline), but you don't want them to be wrapped as an >>> example. An alternate approach which may be preferable would be to >>> expose a defcustom along the lines of org-babel-inline-result-wrapper, >>> which could be used by org-babel-examplize-region instead of "=%s=". >> >> What about always removing trailing newline characters in _inline_ src >> blocks results? > > That is certainly an option. It could be argued that the point of "raw" > is to not change the output at all
That was one point I tried to attract attention onto: since short, we already modify the "raw" output (by "cycling" on tables-alike results). We don't have anymore a real "raw" results which would completely stay untouched. > and sometimes people use (abuse) inline results expecting to be able to have > them insert multi-line results (e.g., they support tabular output). > > There are a number of solutions here which I personally would be happy > with. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban
