* Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 22.4.2013, at 19:11, Bastien <b...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> Eric S Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> writes: >> >> On this slightly off-topic subject, an oculist told me the dark >> background did not really matter, what matters is the contrast. >> Very high and very low are not good, something inbetween (but >> he could point to a way to quantify this.)
I can copy that from what I read and what I experienced so far. >> I use xcalib (http://xcalib.sourceforge.net/) to quickly switch >> from light-on-dark (most often) to dark-on-light (from time to >> time) and I recommend it. I am using the solarized light theme. The dark theme I installed as well but I hardly switch to it. > My experience is also that something below the highest contrast > is much easier on the eyes. My most recent discovery in this > space is http://stereopsis.com/flux/. It is a free app that takes > the blue out of your screen when the sun sets. On OS X, I am using flux as well. Definitely recommended! On Debian GNU/Linux, I am using redshift[1] for the same purpose because flux had some instability issues. So the bright theme gets warmer in the evening which fixes this issue to me. It always huts my eyes a lot when I temporarily disable redshift/flux :-) 1. http://jonls.dk/redshift/ -- mail|git|SVN|photos|postings|SMS|phonecalls|RSS|CSV|XML to Org-mode: > get Memacs from https://github.com/novoid/Memacs < https://github.com/novoid/extract_pdf_annotations_to_orgmode + more on github
