Here is a patch for a couple of tiny issues I encountered in ox-ascii.el
while debugging ox-icalendar.el.  Explanation:

1) There is no function called `org-ascii-footnote-definition' (though
it looks like maybe there once was?), so I changed a reference to it to
`ignore' to be more explicit.

I'm not sure if this is the right thing to do -- maybe the point was to
let the user define such a function if she wishes?  That however would
be inconsistent with the comment that such definitions are ignored (see
below).

2) A tiny change to the comment explaining why there is no such
function: footnote definitions are ignored because they are compiled by
`org-ascii-inner-template', not `org-ascii-template'.

Best,
Richard

diff --git a/lisp/ox-ascii.el b/lisp/ox-ascii.el
index 2191539..4543c34 100644
--- a/lisp/ox-ascii.el
+++ b/lisp/ox-ascii.el
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
     (export-block . org-ascii-export-block)
     (export-snippet . org-ascii-export-snippet)
     (fixed-width . org-ascii-fixed-width)
-    (footnote-definition . org-ascii-footnote-definition)
+    (footnote-definition . ignore)
     (footnote-reference . org-ascii-footnote-reference)
     (headline . org-ascii-headline)
     (horizontal-rule . org-ascii-horizontal-rule)
@@ -1147,7 +1147,7 @@ CONTENTS is nil.  INFO is a plist holding contextual information."
 ;;;; Footnote Definition
 
 ;; Footnote Definitions are ignored.  They are compiled at the end of
-;; the document, by `org-ascii-template'.
+;; the document, by `org-ascii-inner-template'.
 
 
 ;;;; Footnote Reference

Reply via email to