Hi Rainer, Rainer M Krug wrote: > On 28/02/13 10:30, Sebastien Vauban wrote: >> Bastien wrote: >>> Rainer M Krug <r.m.k...@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> I agree - COMMENTing a subtree should automatically disable tangling of >>>> code blocks in the subtree. Would this something which could be >>>> introduced easily, as it seems there are quite a few who assumed that it >>>> would be doing it? >>> >>> This is now the case in master: >>> http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/commit/?id=8e0b45 >> >> Does it work as well for the `:noexport:' tag? > > I don't think it should. Tangling is something different to export, so there > should not be ay interactions between the two in this respect. On the other > hand, COMMENT is generic - it is a COMMENT and does not concern anything. So > it is applicable for tangling as well. > > I would actually say it would be counterintuitive if :noexport: would > influence tangling as it is governed by a completely different approach in > org as well as in what I am doing with the org file.
I've always used :noexport: instead of COMMENT (as I hate the visual clutter of that wide keyword). So, for me, they were equivalent. You must be right, though, that they aren't: COMMENT seems more generic than just export. So, dismiss my request. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban
