Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> writes: > For flexibility and future proofing, it might be worth considering > universal syntax (e.g. $[link "..." :attr1 ... :attr2 ... ...]) for > fancy links instead of changing link syntax. > > I've called it extensible syntax too.
There are already four completely different ways to write a link. I don't think adding a fifth would do any good. I suggest to either slightly change regular link syntax (e.g. [[link][desc][options]]) or replace it completely (the one you suggest is not bad). Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
