Bastien <b...@altern.org> writes: Hi Bastien,
>> It's an optimization done by Bastien. > > I think it's fine to have this by default, the time spared is worth it > IMHO. But I understand many people may want to turn this off. > >> There is a variable to inhibit it. > > (setq org-agenda-inhibit-startup nil) > > If you don't want the optimization. I've done the performance measurements you've requested in Message-ID: <87ehgjgmiv....@thinkpad.tsdh.de>. For me, the "optimized" version is by no means faster than the `org-agenda-inhibit-startup' set to nil. If you reproduce the measurements on your machine and it turns out that you get results inverse to mine, I'm happy to help debugging where the differences come from. > In general, it's worth sticking to the default behavior if you have > many agenda files. If you have only a few, the setting above may be > preferable. My measurements were performed with my 7 normal agenda files + one synthetically constructed. 1 top-level headline with 8000 child TODO items, and then triggering the TODO agenda (and also the week agenda). That's what you've requested in <87vc9vdwx7....@bzg.ath.cx>. Bye, Tassilo
