Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: q > Hello, > > Bastien <b...@altern.org> writes: > >>> Though, I think I have to withdraw my proposal about using #+DATE: >>> value >>> as a time format string. Indeed, date value, along with any >>> document >>> property, is parsed, which defeats the purpose of using it as a >>> format >>> string. >>> >>> We can still implement a convenient macro to handle timestamps in >>> date >>> keyword. >>> >>> What do you think? >> >> Up to whatever you find more practical. > > I have added `org-e-latex-date-format', which can be set to a time > format string. When the #+DATE: value consists in a single timestamp, > it > will be applied to format that timestamp. Otherwise it will be > ignored.
Very cool! I'll check it. -- When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?
