Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes:
> The attached patch moves them into org.el, with an org-timestamp- > prefix. Looks, good, please go ahead. > Though, I think I have to withdraw my proposal about using #+DATE: value > as a time format string. Indeed, date value, along with any document > property, is parsed, which defeats the purpose of using it as a format > string. > > We can still implement a convenient macro to handle timestamps in date > keyword. > > What do you think? Up to whatever you find more practical. Thanks! -- Bastien
