Achim Gratz <strom...@nexgo.de> writes: > Thomas S. Dye writes: >> Interesting, this Emacs distribution removed Org a few days ago. I'm not >> certain why the distributor refers to this as "a rather drastic >> measure." From my perspective as a user, whose interests required using >> the git version of Org from the beginning, the Emacs distribution of Org >> has been nothing but trouble, leading to perplexing (for me) problems >> with mixed installs that I would rather have avoided. > > That's not an entirely fair thing to say. Using an Emacs with a built-in > Org version just makes some problems more prominent that maybe you got > away with in the past.
Apologies if I was unfair. I just don't know (perhaps out of ignorance) how the Org that ships with Emacs has been a benefit to me. I think you and I have different definitions of "problem". From my user's perspective, something I "get away with," i.e., that doesn't have an effect on my work and productivity, isn't a problem. BTW, it was your build system that helped me recognize I had a mixed install, so I could finally squash some bugs that had pestered and perplexed me for a long time. What a relief that was! All the best, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com
