> From: Stefan Monnier <monn...@iro.umontreal.ca> > Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:52:33 -0500 > Cc: 10...@debbugs.gnu.org > > >>>> I guess we could fork Emacs early on and keep this second process > >>>> around as a "process from which to generate new clean slates". > >>> I've been thinking about something like this for a while… if it worked > >>> at least as well as starting a new Emacs instance on all platforms, I'd > >>> favor this approach. > >> IIUC "fork" is not really an option for w32. > > For the intended application spawn should work as well? > > Could be: depends on the precise semantics of spawn, which I don't know.
I'm barely following this thread, so please tell what semantics do you need, and I will then try figuring out whether spawn does what you need.
