Hello, Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 05:35:48PM +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> >> Plain lists accept two optional attributes: `:environment' and >> `:options'. The first one allows to use a non-standard environment >> (i.e. "inparaenum"). The second one allows to specify optional >> arguments for that environment (square brackets are not mandatory). >> > > Are these available for org-e-beamer too? I tried without success. It > would be a great addition (along with the options for images > below). :) > >> Images accept `:float', `:placement' and `:options' as attributes. >> `:float' accepts a symbol among `wrap', `multicolumn', and >> `figure', which defines the float environment for the table (if >> unspecified, an image with a caption will be set in a "figure" >> environment). `:placement' is a string that will be used as >> argument for the environment chosen. `:options' is a string that >> will be used as the optional argument for "includegraphics" macro. >> Since Beamer back-end doesn't redefine how images are handled, you can use the same properties as above, within an attr_latex keyword. About special environments for plain lists, I'm unsure if this is a good idea. AFAIK many don't support overlay specifications so it would lead to errors when one provides both a special environment and an overlay, i.e.: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- #+attr_beamer: :environment inparaenum :overlay "+-" - item 1 - item 2 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Also, Beamer has its own way to render standard lists (through themes) and it could cause problems with foreign packages. On the other hand, I can still make it easy for an user to shoot himself in the foot: code-wise, it is cheap. What do you think? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
