Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > >> Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > >>> That's a bit of work, because, so far, node-property values are not >>> parsed. So it would require to define a new class of node-properties: >>> those with a parsed value. But then, how to decide which properties have >>> their value parsed are parsed and which have not? > >> Thanks for the information and explanation. Back-end-specific >> properties should work nicely in this case. >> >> I'll wait to see what Jonathan thinks about the original query. > > Assuming :EXPORT_TITLE:, :EXPORT_AUTHOR:, :EXPORT_DATE: and this > one, :EXPORT_TOC_ENTRY: (?), will be the only ones being parsed, I can > give it a try. > > I would be consistent with #+caption[short]: long for other elements. > > > Regards,
I'm biased by LaTeX, which uses the optional argument for the TOC and running heads. Since the back-ends are free to use this optional entry as they please, and not only for the TOC, perhaps :EXPORT_SHORT_ENTRY: (because that is its usual function), or :EXPORT_OPTIONAL_ENTRY: (because the back-end has the option to use it where appropriate). All the best, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com
