Here are 6 bugs (or at least changes that might need to be documented) in Org commenting and filling.
Context: commenting and filling used to use generic Emacs facilities, but now use Org-specific ones. original: === x bug 1: the line above now does not get commented even if comment-empty-lines is t. bug 2: this line now does not indent consistently with the rest of emacs. === comment-dwim: === # x # bug 1: the line above now does not get commented even if # comment-empty-lines is t. # bug 2: this line now does not indent consistently with the # rest of emacs. === bug 3: outside of org with filladapt turned OFF, filling this paragraph does not indent it. also auto-fill indents unlike the rest of emacs. ret tab is ok. #bug 4: this paragraph now gets exported in HTML subtree #export, which will likely surprise many people who formerly #used "#" comments instead of "# " comments and don't #carefully check all output. they might #even publish private information automatically without #realizing it using old files that they forgot or did not #know to convert. #bug 5: filling this paragraph with "===" on the following #line will fill the ===, unlike the rest of emacs with #filladapt turned ON. we are supposed to not use filladapt #with org. therefore, how do you emulate the filladapt #behavior so that there is consistency between emacs and #org? Bug 6: what does the Org-specific commenting do? i was not able to determine that from the docstring to org-comment-or-uncomment-region. maybe update docstring would help others trying to find out why commenting works differently in org from the rest of emacs? Hope it helps. Thanks. Samuel -- The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com
