On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Bastien <b...@gnu.org> wrote: > Hi John, > > John Hendy <jw.he...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Date trees are the obvious way to be able to do this, but they don't >> have any of the neat search functionality that I know of. > > Can you describe the search functionality you would like for date-trees? > I'm not sure I groked it.
Date trees allow for a very nice way for filing notes in chronological order, but =C-c / dateRange= does not work for date trees. Previously, active time stamps worked, but I didn't want all my notes showing up in my agenda, so I just dealt with not having a great solution. Then you provided one with the sparse-tree search timestamp-type selection ability, which rocks. Date trees are still the best way to use capture for foolproof chronological storage of notes quickly... but I wouldn't be able to extract notes in a particular date-range with current functionality. Someone provided me with a capture template that would automatically put things in the right place with inactive stamps, so that might have solved my issue. John > > Thanks, > > -- > Bastien
