Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <celose...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey guys, > > Didn't mean to start any kind of flame. >
You did not. I didn't mean to either but my comment could be taken as inflammatory, hence my apology. > @Nick: I'm not a designer, more of a hybrid coder with some design > foundations, but I'm definitely willing to help. I don't like the > current layout because of it's overuse of shadows and its "web1"-style > layout. Also, typography could use some improvement, and we could also > use a better screenshot, to give a better first impression. Neither am I: I generally am happy when I can get to the information I need - I don't care how the page looks but I realize I'm very much in the minority here. FWIW, I'm happy with the website as it is. Perhaps a useful distinction is between content and appearance (the latter to be taken care of by CSS mostly). The shadows and typography are appearance only - the screenshot is more content-like (and btw, there are multiple screenshots so you can reload the page and get another view of org's capabilities - there is no visible indication of that however). Another goal should be ease of maintenance of the website: I'm sure neither Bastien nor Jason have infinite time to tweak things. Nick
