Sankalp <sankalpkh...@gmail.com> wrote: > --f46d044401de1e3ad604c6de28a7 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I'm inclined to agree with Marcelo. > -- > Sankalp > > ******************************************************* > If humans could mate with software, I'd have org-mode's > babies. > --- Chris League on Twitter. > http://orgmode.org/worg/org-quotes.html > ******************************************************* > > > On 10 August 2012 04:44, Jude DaShiell <jdash...@shellworld.net> wrote: > > > Good, that probably means it's one of the more accessible and usable web > > sites on the internet. > > > > On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote: > > > > > Hey list, > > > > > > Don't want to be negative, but doesn't anyone else also think the current > > > design is kind of amateurish and not very attractive? I also did not like > > > the screenshot used, I preferred the previous one, it showed more org > > > capabilities, and the colors and indentation looked better. > > > > > > My two cents and food for thought, > > >
Talk is cheap: how would you improve it? And I don't mean generalities: build a website as you think it should be and then invite us over to take a look. And as Jude suggests, don't forget to keep accessibility/usability issues in mind as you design. Nick
