Jambunathan K <kjambunat...@gmail.com> writes: > Suhail Shergill <suhailsherg...@gmail.com> writes: > >> i'm talking about a scenario where for one reason or another you may >> not want to do that, but may instead only want to export the most >> recent subtree which has been added (since the last time it was >> exported). > > You are trying to merge two /instances of export command/ and not two > /instances of subtrees/. It only so happens that, in your specific > case, you are selecting different subtrees for different export > instances.
yes > What is the value of `org-footnote-section' in your case? the string "Footnotes" > Wrt footnotes, what you see in the Org file is not what the exporter > sees. Footnote definitions get collected in to the buffer at a suitable > point as part of pre-processing (see `org-footnote-normalize'). Also > footnote definitions can be placed by hand at arbitrary points through > out your Org file. hmm right. > I have a feeling that patch requires more additions. you're probably right. > Furthermore, you also need to submit a patch to org-e-html.el which will > replace org-html.el in the future. > I will let the owners of org-html.el to take over from here. *if* this patch makes sense, i'm willing to submit a patch for org-e-html.el. does anyone have any views? does this patch 'make sense', and is this the right place for it? -- Suhail
