Hi Eric, On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Eric S Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> wrote: > Avdi Grimm <gro...@inbox.avdi.org> writes: > >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:41 PM, suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> With this syntax it would be very easy to write both really long (40-50 >>> frames) as well as quick and short presentations. >>> >> >> I've only been using Org and Beamer for a little while, but if I understand >> it correctly this sounds preferable. > > Well, I will have to chime in with a contrary view. I like using > headlines to define blocks, and I use blocks on almost every frame. I > have the following reasons for preferring a headline approach: > > - the proposed approach does not easily (at all?) cater for blocks > within blocks > > - ease of hiding of content: org for me is still primarily an outliner! > > - being able to re-arrange content in a frame quickly (M-<up>, etc.) > > - within frames, there is no other use for lower level headlines. Using > these for blocks seems appropriate. What else could they be used for? >
Those are very strong points. I didn't think this way when I gave my comments. > Obviously, I would adapt to whatever is provided. > Same goes for me here. :) -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.
