Le Tue, 08 May 2012 16:10:02 +0200, Bastien a écrit : > Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> writes: > >> Oh, I agree - the removal is certainly desirable. I meant whether the >> non-removal of not-today's date is intentional :-) > > Thinking about this again, I don't see any reason why we should keep any > timestamp in the headline. I pushed a fix for this.
Hello, PMJI, but I often used to construct headlines such as * Some course (or any other kind of recurring meeting) ** <2012-05-08 mar.> ** <2012-05-15 mar.> ** <2012-05-22 mar.> and then filling the level two headlines as I attend the lectures. This situation sometimes creates an error message when building the agenda view, so now I use * Some course ** Lecture <2012-05-08 mar.> ** Lecture <2012-05-15 mar.> ** Lecture <2012-05-22 mar.> I understand from your post that this way of doing things should be avoided, right ? What would be the "correct way" ? I guess I could do something like : * Some course <2012-05-08 mar.> <2012-05-15 mar.> <2012-05-22 mar.> and create headlines for each lecture as I attend them. Best wishes, -- Nico.
