Bastien <b...@altern.org> wrote: > Hi Nick, > > Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> writes: > > > so it becomes "<2012-04-17.*?>". Hence it removes the date in the third > > example above, but not in the other two. > > > > The question is whether this is intended or not > > I think this is intended. If timestamps were not removed from today's > date, agenda listing items scheduled/timestamped for today would be less > readable. >
Oh, I agree - the removal is certainly desirable. I meant whether the non-removal of not-today's date is intentional :-) Nick
