On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Brian van den Broek <brian.van.den.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 April 2012 18:16, John Hendy <jw.he...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Brian van den Broek >> <brian.van.den.br...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've attached a small patch to the documentation that resolves a >>> conflict between the manual's advice not to include timestamps in >>> headlines and some of its examples where it does just that. >>> >> >> Can you point to the discouragement? I do this and would like to know >> why it's discouraged but didn't see anything noting it in the manual >> section on dates and timestamps. >> >> Thanks, >> John > > > Hi John, > > The first footnote on > <http://orgmode.org/manual/Handling-links.html#Handling-links>, for > instance. There may be more, but this is the one I could find, > quickly.
Gotcha. Just my take -- your patch made me think it was a major offense. The man seems to just mention that it can mess up headline linking. Not a big deal and still is a valid point, but wasn't what I expected. Thanks for the link! John > > Best, > > Brian vdB
