On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 10:52:05 -0500 Bernt Hansen <be...@norang.ca> wrote:
> Detlef Steuer <detlef.ste...@gmx.de> writes: > > > Dear ORGers. > > > > recently I started to priorize my TODO items. > > (May be that implies failure of my GTD setup, but I don't want to > > discuss that ... ) > > > > I found org sorts TODOs in the following way in my agenda view: > > > > TODO [#A] > > TODO [#B] > > TODO/WAITING > > TODO [#C] > > > > I don't understand the reasoning in putting TODOs without priority or > > WAITING without priority before priority #C. > > > > Conceptually "no priority" (for me) means "not decided how important or > > not important at all, but would like to work on it", In contrast "#C" > > means "must be done, but do #A and #B first". > > They don't have 'no priority' -- they have the default priority which is > probably [#C]. You can set the default using variables. > > See: > org-default-priority > The default priority of TODO items. > org-highest-priority > The highest priority of TODO items. A character like ?A, ?B etc. > org-lowest-priority > The lowest priority of TODO items. A character like ?A, ?B etc. > > You're free to change the default to Z or something as long as you also > set org-lowest-priority appropriately. Thank you both! Sorry for not getting it from the fine manual. 56 min from asking a question to two perfect answers! Just great! Detlef > > Regards, > Bernt > > > > > > It would IMHO feel much more natural to sort > > > > #A, #B, #C, no priority. > > > > Is that (easily) possible? > > > > SETUP: > > Org-mode version 7.8.03 (release_7.8.03.553.g62a63) > > emacs GNU Emacs 23.2.1 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) of 2011-02-22 on build34 > > > > Thx > > Detlef > >
