Detlef Steuer <detlef.ste...@gmx.de> writes: > Dear ORGers. > > recently I started to priorize my TODO items. > (May be that implies failure of my GTD setup, but I don't want to > discuss that ... ) > > I found org sorts TODOs in the following way in my agenda view: > > TODO [#A] > TODO [#B] > TODO/WAITING > TODO [#C] > > I don't understand the reasoning in putting TODOs without priority or > WAITING without priority before priority #C. > > Conceptually "no priority" (for me) means "not decided how important or > not important at all, but would like to work on it", In contrast "#C" > means "must be done, but do #A and #B first".
They don't have 'no priority' -- they have the default priority which is probably [#C]. You can set the default using variables. See: org-default-priority The default priority of TODO items. org-highest-priority The highest priority of TODO items. A character like ?A, ?B etc. org-lowest-priority The lowest priority of TODO items. A character like ?A, ?B etc. You're free to change the default to Z or something as long as you also set org-lowest-priority appropriately. Regards, Bernt > > It would IMHO feel much more natural to sort > > #A, #B, #C, no priority. > > Is that (easily) possible? > > SETUP: > Org-mode version 7.8.03 (release_7.8.03.553.g62a63) > emacs GNU Emacs 23.2.1 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) of 2011-02-22 on build34 > > Thx > Detlef
