Hello, Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> writes:
> I think it's a good idea, and would suggest this: > > * If it is not going to have features added, then [[ref:asdf]] is OK > * If it /is/ going to have features added, then I recommend ES/US > > ES/US is extensible syntax / universal syntax, a specific proposal for > an orthogonal and future-proof syntax for new capabilities like this. Ok, I found the thread[1] about extensible syntax for links. I don't think that it would be a good idea to use a completely different syntax for just one type of link. Either we change the whole link system into the extensible syntax proposal, or we don't change it at all. I don't mind either way, but that's orthogonal to the problem at hand. For now, I'll assume we keep the classical link syntax. > For example, you might want to put the target anywhere, not just where > there are elements. Org already has targets for that: <<anywhere>> and [[anywhere]]. The [[ref:element]] link is more interesting for its export effect. Moving back and forth between it and targeted element is a bonus. Regards, [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/11896 -- Nicolas Goaziou
