"Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> writes: [...]
>> I think it might be good to have a parameter that expands noweb >> references on evaluation and tangling, but leaves them alone during >> export. This way the code block would be fully functional, but wouldn't >> duplicate code during export (when the noweb references are to other >> code blocks in the same document). > > I'd find that interesting as well, but then the names of the code blocks must > be visible again (in HTML and PDF exports), something that has disappeared > over time. +1 for both 1) the :noweb no-export or similar 2) and the possibility to include source block names in export - Andreas
