On 11/1/11 8:02 PM, Eric Schulte wrote:
As for variable handling, I think the solution is to ensure that on the
code-block side of things, a var string like "foo=3, bar=2, foo=1"
results in,
foo=1
bar=2
that is, subtree variable definitions will pre-empty earlier definitions
of the same variable..
Yes, that sounds like the way to go. My previous message implied that
the var string should only contain unique variable names, but I see
that that would be needlessly complicated.
This is an interesting approach; I like it better than the property
block. I'm sure we will think of other useful applications for
cumulative properties, too (conversely, there'll probably be some side
effect that will turn around and bite us at some point, though I can't
think what it would be).
Yours,
Christian
