Christian Moe <m...@christianmoe.com> wrote: > On 11/1/11 8:17 AM, henry atting wrote: > > > I was thinking of a column formula but have no clue if it's > > possible and if so, how. > > > > In this short example the formula's length is no problem but for a > > table with 12 rows or more it certainly is; -- and currently it's the > > only way I can realize it. > > > > | | | > > |---+---| > > | 2 | | > > | 6 | 4 | > > | 7 | 5 | > > #+TBLFM: @3$2=vmean(@2$1..@3$1::@4$2=vmean(@2$1..@4$1 > > > | | | > |---+-----| > | 2 | | > | 6 | 4 | > | 7 | 5 | > | 3 | 4.5 | > | 9 | 5.4 | > #+TBLFM: @3$2..@>$2=vmean(@2$1..@0$1) >
Another common way to deal with an exceptional cell is to use a field formula for the exceptional cell and a column formula for the rest: field formulas take precedence: #+TBLFM: @2$2 = string("") :: $2 = vmean(@2$1..@0$2) Nick